Corruption in Indian judiciary is viewed as unavoidable: over 45% of Indians accept the judiciary is degenerate, a view shared by outside evaluations. In addition to the fact that corruption is wild in the lower courts, some have asserted that this corruption arrives at the most significant levels. As taught in the llb courses in west Bengal, Judicial accountability to the courts are made responsible to the general population.
There are various changes that can be executed to accomplish a corruption free judiciary and check existing practices and they are as per the following:
- Increment the quantity of judges, as this would bring about the expedient procedure and empower speedy solution for the residents.
- Sets of accepted rules, an endeavour was made by the Conference of Chief equity in 1996 which brought about an implicit rules being received by a full court meeting of the Supreme Court under the title ‘Repetition of Values of Judicial Life’.
- Court record the executives ought to be overhauled and courts ought to be furnished with innovation so all the authoritative reports and cases are refreshed online routinely, this will without a doubt help in straightforwardness.
- There ought to be money related guide to the appointed authorities as taught in the llb courses in west Bengal.
A Judicial Standard and Accountability Bill, 2010 was presented in the Lok Sabha on first December, 2010. The bill was presented by the priest of law and Justice, it expects judges to pronounce their advantages and furthermore of their life partner and kids, it further sets down judicial standards to evacuate Supreme Court and High court judges. This bill has not been passed at this point since it represents an issue about the harmony between the freedom and accountability of judiciary.
On the whole, the current framework is debased and needs to change. As taught in the llb courses in west Bengal, corruption practice should be halted at any cost, judges are given huge force and such force ought not to be abused, the nation is in urgent need of an enactment which adjusts the accountability and freedom part of the Judiciary. The Judges are equalizers, and they ought not to bow down to the media, military, religions, cash or media. They ought to consistently win rule of law and remain with equity constantly.
